Six Captains And A Slow-Starting Team

With the other teams in Pool B being England, South Africa, New Zealandand the Netherlands, it is fairly obvious that by the quarter-final stage, to be playedfor the first time, the two minor teams will be eliminated.

From the knockout stage onwards, it is a virtual lottery, with the teamperforming well on the day getting through. New Zealand in the previous World Cup is onesuch example. Riding the crest of a wave, the 1992 co-hosts crashed out to out-of-formPakistan, who went on to record their maiden triumph. That’s one-day cricket for you.

The Pakistan selectors have picked the best possible 14 to defend the crown. AamirSohail and Saeed Anwar make an attacking opening pair ideally suited to one-dayers. Theygo for their shots right from the first ball, a style that does have its drawbacks. Onewould like to swap them for a more gritty pair such as Australia’s Mark Taylor andMichael Slater, who are more cautious and wait for their opportunities. The selectorswould be wise to send in the more experienced and cautious Rameez Raja to open the inningswith Saeed Anwar. The middle order—with Ijaz Ahmad, Inzamam-ul-Haq, Salim Malik andJaved Miandad—has a look of solidity about it. All four are capable of turning thetide with their technique and experience. Age and fatigue may, however, get the better ofMiandad. He holds the unique record of having played in all the World Cups since the firstone in 1975. If Sohail opens with Anwar, Miandad will have to fight against Rameez for aberth.

Skipper Wasim Akram is the best fast bowler in the world today.Unfortunately, neither Aaqib Javed nor Waqar Younis in their present form are in aposition to provide the added sting. Much will depend on leg spinner Mushtaq Ahmed toprovide support. His googlies will be the centre of attraction and it should be a classicbattle against his Aussie counterpart Shane Warne and India’s Anil Kumble to see whois the world’s best spinner.

The Pakistan side has earned the ignominious distinction of having sixplayers in its ranks who have at one time or the other captained the country. Akram,Malik, Rameez, Miandad, Waqar andAnwar were all tried and rejected for the top slot,before Akram was given a second chance. This could be a drawback if there is a clash ofegos.

Experience has proved that Pakistan are slow starters. They seem toplay their second half better than the first. Sometimes they take so long to warm up thatthe tournament ends before they reach top gear. In the last World Cup, they came fromalmost nowhere, and just in the nick of time, to beat the seemingly unassailable NewZealand and then clinch the Cup by beating England in the final.

The rules of the 1996 tournament give Pakistan supporters cause forhope. They can relax in the group stage as their place in the last eight is more or lessassured. And the final being staged at Lahore will be an additional advantage for theco-hosts.

The final is a long way off, admittedly. But if the Pakistanis make itthat far, they must be favoured no matter which country they come up against, with thecrowd, the wicket and the weather all in their favour. An India-Pakistan final? Such arethe tensions when they come up against each other that the match may be reduced from amere game of cricket to a war situation. One simply shudders at the thought.